A Beautiful Constraint: How To Transform Your Limitations Into Advantages, and Why It's Everyone's Business
by Adam Morgan
How we frame the question is critical to making a constraint beautiful, because it forces us to think and behave in a different way. We call these kinds of questions propelling questions. A propelling question is one that has both a bold ambition and a significant constraint linked together. It is called a propelling question because the presence of those two different elements together in the same question does not allow it to be answered in the way we have answered previous questions; it propels us off the path on which we have become dependent. Constraints fall into four different groups: constraints of foundation (where we are limited in something that is usually seen as a foundational element for success); constraints of resource (where we are limited in an important resource, such as money or people); constraints of time (where we are limited in the amount of time we have to do something); and constraints of method (where we are limited by having to do something in a certain way).
Our hypothesis at the time was that there were three kinds of people: Victim: Someone who lowers their ambition when faced with a constraint. Neutralizer: Someone who refuses to lower the ambition, but finds a different way to deliver the ambition instead. Transformer: Someone who finds a way to use a constraint as an opportunity, possibly even increasing their ambition along the way.
Making expensive things is easy, he would insistently tell his company. Making affordable things that also work and last—that's the real challenge. And it's a challenge IKEA must constantly rise to in order to meet its purpose of championing “the many”—ordinary people who deserve the change a well-designed home can make in their lives.
We'll explore these interrelated parts to creating abundance: Seeing potential sources of resource around us. Reframing how we think about our own resources to create new value we can exchange. Understanding how to share and trade our resources to get what we need. Exploring how and why we might join forces to multiply our resources.
To be very good at problem-solving, you need to be able to very clearly articulate the problem you are trying to solve, and constraints are key parameters of that definition (David Ogilvy's “tight brief”). Marissa Mayer shares this view. She needs the shape and focus of constraints to provide clear challenges to overcome, she says.
We are living in an era of extraordinary people rewriting our sense of what is possible. They make an unarguable case that a constraint should be regarded as a stimulus for positive change—we can choose to use it as an impetus to explore something new and arrive at a breakthrough. Not in spite of the constraint, but because of it.
"How we frame the question is critical to making a constraint beautiful, because it forces us to think and behave in a different way. We call these kinds of questions propelling questions. A propelling question is one that has both a bold ambition and a significant constraint linked together. It is called a propelling question because the presence of those two different elements together in the same question does not allow it to be answered in the way we have answered previous questions; it propels us off the path on which we have become dependent."
"Constraints fall into four different groups: constraints of foundation (where we are limited in something that is usually seen as a foundational element for success); constraints of resource (where we are limited in an important resource, such as money or people); constraints of time (where we are limited in the amount of time we have to do something); and constraints of method (where we are limited by having to do something in a certain way)."
"We can embrace smaller constraints without an emotional narrative, but the bigger the constraint, the more motivation we will need to power us through the inevitable rounds of exploration and initial failing forward. Senior scientists and engineers at IBM are taught narrative techniques to help them engage a broader group within the company around the value of a project, and we'll need to do something similar."
"We can embrace smaller constraints without an emotional narrative, but the bigger the constraint, the more motivation we will need to power us through the inevitable rounds of exploration and initial failing forward. Senior scientists and engineers at IBM are taught narrative techniques to help them engage a broader group within the company around the value of a project, and we'll need to do something similar."
"Our hypothesis at the time was that there were three kinds of people: Victim: Someone who lowers their ambition when faced with a constraint. Neutralizer: Someone who refuses to lower the ambition, but finds a different way to deliver the ambition instead. Transformer: Someone who finds a way to use a constraint as an opportunity, possibly even increasing their ambition along the way."
"Making expensive things is easy, he would insistently tell his company. Making affordable things that also work and last—that's the real challenge. And it's a challenge IKEA must constantly rise to in order to meet its purpose of championing “the many”—ordinary people who deserve the change a well-designed home can make in their lives."
"We'll explore these interrelated parts to creating abundance: Seeing potential sources of resource around us. Reframing how we think about our own resources to create new value we can exchange. Understanding how to share and trade our resources to get what we need. Exploring how and why we might join forces to multiply our resources."
- →To be very good at problem-solving, you need to be able to very clearly articulate the problem you are trying to solve, and constraints are key parameters of that definition (David Ogilvy's “tight brief”). Marissa Mayer shares this view. She needs the shape and focus of constraints to provide clear challenges to overcome, she says.
- →We are living in an era of extraordinary people rewriting our sense of what is possible. They make an unarguable case that a constraint should be regarded as a stimulus for positive change—we can choose to use it as an impetus to explore something new and arrive at a breakthrough. Not in spite of the constraint, but because of it.
- →So, from this “gift” of denying the agency everything they thought they knew about how to do successful advertising, harnessed to Wieden's own constraint of not having talent to do that kind of advertising anyway, the most widely admired and consistently successful communications campaign in the world was born.
- →Invested Stakeholders These are the groups with which we have the strongest relationships today, because they have a stake in our fortunes and are the closest to us: our co-workers, members of the board, non-executive directors and investors, along with our most fervent and committed loyalists and user groups.
Looking for something similar?
Describe your situation. The search finds the right book from the entire library.